My research spans econometric and statistical theory of time series and network processes. I apply these techniques to climate and health econometrics and develop asymptotically valid procedures for empirical researchers.
Papers (under review and published)
1. Cointegration without unit roots with James Duffy.
Revise and resubmit at Quantitative Economics
Click here for abstract
In response to the criticism voiced in Elliott (1998), we propose a new concept of cointegration, termed quasi-cointegration, that treats unit and near unit roots of the characteristic polynomial of a vector autoregressive model in the same manner. We identify the quasi-cointegrating matrix as an extension of its classical counterpart defined in Johansen (1995) as the object that produces linear combinations of the series that exhibit rapid mean-reversion. We proceed via restricted maximum likelihood where the invariant subspace of the characteristic polynomial associated with near and actual unit roots appear as restrictions on the VAR parameters. We then offer an estimation and inference procedure that is asymptotically valid and avoids the bias which gave rise to this problem. The ‘nearness to unity’ parameter appears as a nuisance coefficient which we eliminate via a Bonferroni-based procedure to form valid confidence sets. To attain statistical power, we use the method of Elliott, Mueller, Watson (2015). Our results indicate that in the presence of near unit roots, our method remains size-controlled with good power properties while conventional methods become severely size-distorted. Indeed, 5% tests showed rejection probabilities of up to 80% for a small departure from a unit root. In the classical unit root case, our method retains power and quasi-cointegrating vectors are identical to their classical counterparts. An application demonstrates the usability of this approach.2. Hypothesis testing on invariant subspaces of non-diagonalizable matrices with applications to network statistics
Under review at Biometrika
Click here for abstract
We generalise the inference procedure for eigenvectors of symmetrizable matrices of Tyler (1981) to that of invariant and singular subspaces of non-diagonalizable matrices. Wald tests for invariant vectors and t-tests for their individual coefficients perform well in simulations, despite the matrix being not symmetric. Using these results, it is now possible to perform inference on network statistics that depend on eigenvectors of non-symmetric adjacency matrices as they arise in empirical applications from directed networks. Further, we find that statisticians only need control over the first-order Davis-Kahan bound to control convergence rates of invariant subspace estimators to higher-orders. For general invariant subspaces, the minimal eigenvalue separation dominates the first-order bound potentially slowing convergence rates considerably. In an example, we find that accounting for uncertainty in network estimates changes empirical conclusions about the ranking of nodes' popularity.3. Forecasting dementia incidence with Eric French, Yuntao Chen, and Eric Brunner
Under review at Journal of the American Statistical Association
Click here for abstract
We proceed in two stages. Using UK ELSA data, we first estimate dementia incidence rates from 2002 to 2016 and derive a data array comparable to a life table. Second, we employ a rank 1 factor model according to Lee and Carter (1992) to decompose the incidence rates into a period and age effect. We feed the period effect time series into a specially designed Kalman filter with restricted time-dependent observational variance to estimate filtered states. On this basis, we found that a random walk model fits best and construct forecasts for all age groups and both sexes. We find that despite a recently observed uptick in dementia trends, the overall trend is flat.4. Effectiveness of medical treatment for bipolar disorder with Fitzgerald et al.
British Journal of Psychiatry vol. 221(5) (2022) pp. 692-700
Click here for abstract
Mood stabilisers are the main treatment for bipolar disorder. However, it is uncertain which drugs have the best outcomes.We investigate whether rates of suicide, self-harm and psychiatric hospital admission in individuals with bipolar disorder differ between mood stabilisers.
A cohort design was applied to people aged 15+ years who were diagnosed with bipolar disorder and living in Denmark during 1995–2016. Treatment with lithium, valproate, other mood stabilisers and antipsychotics were compared in between- and within-individual analyses, and adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics and previous self-harm.
Lithium was associated with lower rates of suicide, self-harm and psychiatric hospital readmission in all analyses. With respect to suicide, lithium was superior to no treatment. Although confounding by indication cannot be excluded, lithium seems to have better outcomes in the treatment of bipolar disorder than other mood stabilisers.